The Evolution of the scientific fund indicators in the areas of Literature and Linguistics at CNPq (2009-2019): Diagnosis of funding in a decade, with special reference to 2016-2019

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18309/ranpoll.v56.2010

Keywords:

Scientific funding, Literature, Linguistics, Produtividade em Pesquisa research funding, CNPq

Abstract

This article presents the evolution of selected scientific fund indicators in the areas of Literature and Linguistics, during the years 2009 to 2019, within the scope of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). To this end, raw data on investments from the body’s main Public Calls serving the areas of Literature and Linguistics were compiled. In order to show that the low rate of concessions is not due to the quality of the projects, but to the low availability of funds, the relationship between requests and recommendations is analyzed, taking as an example the evaluation carried out by the Subcommittee of the Linguistics area, in the period 2016-2019. Investments in other areas of knowledge are also presented, with the aim of carrying out a comparative reading of scientific funding in the Great Area of Human, Social and Applied Social Sciences, as well as with selected areas in other Great Areas of Knowledge. Finally, we seek to present na Agenda that combines the individual demands of researchers with the collective strategies of scientific communities and associations to advance scientific support in Literature and Linguistics at CNPq.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Arquimedes Belo Paiva, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Programa de Pós-graduação em Política Científica e Tecnológica, Campinas, SP, Brasil.

Post-doctorate in Science and Technology Policy from the State University of Campinas (Unicamp), PhD in Social Sciences from the Center for Research and Postgraduate Studies on the Americas of the University of Brasília (CEPPAC/UnB) with a sandwich period at the Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences (FLACSO Mexico), Master in Sociology from the University of Brasília and Bachelor and Licentiate degrees in Social Sciences from the Federal University of Goiás (UFG). He was Coordinator of the Research Program in Human and Social Sciences of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and Technical Advisor to the former Directorate of Engineering, Exact, Human and Social Sciences (DEHS/CNPq) and, currently, works as Manager of Digital Platforms and Services at the Directorate of Results Analysis and Digital Solutions (DASD/CNPq) of CNPq. Member of the Brazilian Network of Latin American and Caribbean Researchers (BLAC Network) and of the Canadian Association for Latin American and Caribbean Studies (CALACS). Member of the Scielo Brasil Advisory Committee (2021-2022) and Evaluator of the Journal of Studies and Research on the Americas (REPAM/UnB). He also worked as a sociologist at the Ministry of Cities (2006-2012) - performing the functions of Technical Advisor and National Coordinator for the Prevention and Mediation of Urban Land Conflicts - and university professor (2006-2014) at several private higher education institutions in the Federal District. He has experience in the major areas of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, with emphasis on the subareas of Science and Technology Policy; Studies in Science, Technology and Society (STS) and Urban Sociology.

References

CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO - CNPq. Bolsas individuais no país: RN-028/2015. Brasília, 2015. Disponível em: <http://memoria2.cnpq.br/view/-/journal_content/56_INSTANCE_0oED/10157/2958271>. Acesso em: 21 dez. 2022.

MINISTÉRIO DA CIÊNCIA, TECNOLOGIA, INOVAÇÕES E COMUNICAÇÕES – MCTIC. Estratégia Nacional de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação 2016-2022. Disponível em: < http://www.finep.gov.br/images/a-finep/Politica/16_03_2018_Estrategia_Nacional_de_Ciencia_Tecnologia_e_Inovacao_2016_2022.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2022.

MOTA, Ana C. DE S. et al. A evolução dos bolsistas de produtividade e de desenvolvimento tecnológico do CNPq: um estudo de caso para Ciências Ambientais. Parcerias Estratégicas, Brasília, v. 23, n. 46, p. 135-154, jan. jun. 2018. Disponível em: <http://seer.cgee.org.br/index.php/parcerias_estrategicas/article/viewFile/893/811>. Acesso em: 21 dez. 2022.

PAIVA, A. Belo. A emergência da política de fomento interdisciplinar em Ciências Sociais na América Latina: as experiências do Brasil (CNPq/CAPES) e do México (CONACYT). Tese (Doutorado em Estudos Comparados Sobre as Américas) – Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Brasiília, Brasília, 2018. Disponível em: <http://repositorio.unb.br/bitstream/10482/31919/3/2018_ArquimedesBeloPaiva.pdf>. Acesso em: 03 dez. 2022.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-06

How to Cite

Massini-Cagliari, G., & Paiva, A. B. (2025). The Evolution of the scientific fund indicators in the areas of Literature and Linguistics at CNPq (2009-2019): Diagnosis of funding in a decade, with special reference to 2016-2019. Revista Da Anpoll, 56, e2010. https://doi.org/10.18309/ranpoll.v56.2010

Issue

Vol. 56 (2025)

Section

Dossiê: Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação na Linguística e na Literatura

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Revista da Anpoll

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Os trabalhos publicados na Revista da Anpoll são licenciados sob os termos da licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional. Assim, os/as autores/as ou terceiros podem copiar e redistribuir o material licenciado em qualquer suporte ou formato, e remixar, transformar, ou criar a partir do material desde que sejam dados os devidos créditos ao trabalho original. Ressalta-se que a redistribuição, transformação ou criação, de iniciativa de dos/as autores/as ou de terceiros, deve mencionar a precedência de sua publicação neste periódico, citando-se o volume, número e data desta publicação.